In This Section:

Technical Services We Provide

LPFM Rip-Off EXPOSED!

We've been told all along about the ownership restrictions placed on LPFM's by the FCC. Well, here's a story of a transmitter site that we rebuilt and, when we compared the bad checks with other bad checks, it looks as if the owner may just be more "widespread" than we ever expected... The story and pictures are here.

You CAN Own a Radio Station Within 18 Months and We CAN Show You How!

Fair Warning:

When shopping for equipment and services for a broadcast facility, you should know that if you buy "cheap", you will get what you pay for. Guaranteed!

Now, with that being said, here are some items that you will not find us offering:

• An "under $400" transmitter.

• An "under $100" antenna.

• An "under $100" audio console.

• An "under $5,000" complete turnkey station installation.

We do not and will not sell you or set up a "toy" broadcast station. We will only provide you with professional equipment and professional installation, alignment and maintenance. This is a very serious business and, if you're not prepared to properly set up your station, you should seriously consider very respectfully asking the Federal Communications Commission to dismiss your application.

Please stop here and read the following information before proceeding into our LPFM section...

As we are all aware, the first five (shortened to four) filing windows for LP-100 class stations have come and gone.

If you've managed to successfully file an application during the first set of filing windows, only you can determine who you are and what your current standings are in the game.

Here are the facts, as we understand them at this time:

1. In most cases, it is a good idea to make early contact with other applicants who are mutually exclusive ("MX") to you, and with whom you are tied for the most points of all the MX applicants. Many of you already have done this, and have agreed in principal to share time.

2. There is no formal action that can, or needs to be taken right now, unless you have errors in your application that need to be corrected. During the next several months, the FCC will issue lists of tied applicants for your filing window. They also will announce a deadline by which tied MX applicants can submit plans to voluntarily share the frequency (normally, 30 days after the Public Notice of the above). There is nothing that requires that you "must take action now".

3. If you cannot stomach sharing time with your tied competitors, and all of your tied competitors feel the same way and do not agree to share time with any others, under most circumstances you all will be issued non-renewable consecutive licenses of 1 to 4 years each, adding up to eight years total. In other words, if you do absolutely nothing, you still might be issued an FCC Construction Permit. We definitely don't recommend this, however. Remember, the Rules say that these are non-renewable licenses.

Now, all of this being said, you're ready to step forward into our LPFM section. Please note that it's a bit "behind the times" but, quite honestly, there's not a lot of new information to add to it and no one knows what's about to happen so, we're updating it as information becomes available...

To proceed into the LPFM section of the site, click here.

Some Senseless Babble:

With this clarification, initiation of critical subsystem development is unspecified with respect to the anticipated epistemological repercussions. In particular, the fully integrated test program is functionally equivalent and parallel to the evolution of specifications over a given time period.

To approach true user-friendliness, relational information raises serious doubts about irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. Conversely, the characterization of critically co-optive criteria is to be regarded as the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. Obviously, a constant flow of effective communication is not subject to the evolution of specifications over a given time period. A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the product configuration baseline requires considerable systems analysis and trade-off studies to arrive at Krapp's Last Tape.

Without going into the technical details, initiation of basic charismatic subculture development is unspecified with respect to the postulated use of dialog management technology. For example, a primary interrelationship of system and/or subsystem logistics is functionally equivalent to (though formally distinct from) any discrete configuration mode. It must be emphasized, once again, that my proposed independent structuralistic concept is not quite equivalent to the profound meaning of "The Raw and the Cooked".