The Information Presented Herein Is Based On Facts & Opinions Formed After Six Years Of Personal Observation.

ASSumed the Role of her Former Boss & Mentor "The Drug-Dealing DA"!

Proud To Make Easy The Existence Of The "Undocumented Pharmacists Association of America"!

Sharon Lynn Switzer: DA (Drug Advocate) & Criminal Enabler - 31st Judicial District of Texas.

Shamrock is the Proud Home of TexasToiletPaper.com!

Webcam Will Be Online Very Soon...

Documented Evidence

This page contains links to DOCUMENTED AND REAL EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES WILLFULLY AND MALICIOUSLY PLOTTED AND CARRIED OUT BY LYNN SWITZER that we are making available for download.

Note: All file sizes are approximate, download times may vary depending on connection speeds.

Please read the following formal complaint and grievance concerning acts of retaliation, malicious prosecution and corruption within the office of the 31st Judicial District of Texas:

Later in this message, I will show you absolute and irrefutable evidence of a current and continuing criminal conspiracy between a Shamrock City employee and our local district attorney. This criminal conspiracy is an ongoing and thriving conspiracy even as I write this letter of complaint. It involves a still pending case against my wife that is based on nothing more than lies, falsified “evidence” and perjured testimony that is made possible only by and through the malicious efforts of the district attorney for the 31^st judicial district, Lynn Switzer. This conspiracy involves further acts of conspiracy and perjury that continue on both now and into the foreseeable future as a continuing course of criminal conduct that are also made possible only by and through the malicious efforts of the district attorney for the 31^st judicial district.

Before presenting these charges, I must first pass on some background information pertaining to my situation and this complaint. If you will but take the time to read the following information, you will soon clearly see that Sharon Lynn Switzer has thoroughly, completely, willfully, and maliciously failed in one of the most basic prerequisites of a legitimate criminal prosecution: She has been and is still, to this very day, unable and unwilling to demonstrate that the “complainant” in these matters has ever, at any time, held legal title to the properties that were wrongfully labeled as having been “stolen” by both herself and the former district attorney. These properties, to which I was duly entitled and can demonstrate by virtue of federally issued documentation as well as the testimony of federal officials, have not ever, at any time, been the legal properties of the “complainant” in these matters and he has not ever, at any time, been able to produce any form of “proof of ownerships (other than his perjured testimony) demonstrating otherwise whereas, I show FEDERALLY AUTHORIZED proof of ownership which Ms. Switzer casually instructs the courts “should be dismissed as that is not a Texas document”.

The former district attorney and close associate to Ms. Switzer who initiated and ordered this wrongful prosecution, as an act of criminal retaliation, was one Richard James Roach who is currently serving both state and federal prison sentences. Mr. Roach had learned (by and through the “complainant” in this malicious prosecution) that I - as the owner of the local radio station - had discovered his involvement in illicit drugs, firearms, child pornography and related criminal activities. Because of his learning this, Mr. Roach jumped at the opportunity to have the threat to his criminal activities (me) removed by any means at his disposal.

As background information on this matter:

In 2002, I moved myself, my wife and our two daughters to Texas to manage and take ownership and control of a small FM radio station there, as an individual. I moved my wife and 2 children there after legally assuming control and unquestionable ownership of the station by and through the properly prescribed legal procedures as established by the Federal Communications Commission in Washington, D.C. that have been followed through by every radio station transfer that has ever occurred as THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO LEGALLY TRANSFER CONTROL OF A BROADCAST FACILITY.

The problems began shortly after I had the FCC to legally transfer control of the license into my name. Again, I must reiterate, with the consent, blessings and assistance of the previous owner and the federal government.

Upon learning of the transfer, the director of Shamrock Economic Development Corporation, Mr. David Rushing began walking into my office demanding (under threat of force) all of my station’s receivables. He made no efforts at all to hide what he was doing and seemed quite proud to tell me that “this is just how we do things around here” and, for a period of some 18 months, had managed to lead an armed party consisting of himself, an SEDC board member and the former (now deceased) county constable on an armed “raid” of our business during which they (according to their own attorney) “accidentally misappropriated” equipment valued at more than $85,000.00. I have recordings of this as well as transcripts of court testimony in which Mr. Rushing brazenly brags of these crimes. These acts were reported to the office of the district attorney who chose to “look the other way”.

Mr. Rushing also gave various people permission to steal from me as they saw fit. One gentleman even made a trip from Kentucky and (in the middle of the night), entered our building in order to remove an entire truck load of equipment for which I possessed clear title and held original sales receipts! Upon reporting this burglary to Shamrock Police, Officer Brandon Brown (who is now working with the Wheeler County Sheriff's department as a deputy) conducted an investigation in which he was able to obtain enough evidence (including testimony of the man’s own mother verifying that the property had been hidden at her home, in Kentucky) to make an arrest. Later, Officer Brown came to me and explained that, even though he had “an iron-clad case”, the man had been released “as a favor to Rick Roach (the former DA) who has ordered that no further action be taken for the radio station at the request of and as a favor to David Rushing”.

Mr. Rushing later, with the assistance of former DA Richard James Roach, had me arrested for cashing and/or depositing into my account several checks for advertising revenue that my advertisers had made payable to my station in consideration for advertising that I had run for them. I cashed these checks only after my attorneys (including a communications attorney in Washington DC who does nothing but specialize in such practice involving the legal transfer of radio stations) advised me that the radio station, including its receivables, were clearly mine with no encumbrances of any kind. Mr. Rushing’s claim was that the station and its receivables were owed to him and SEDC (Shamrock Economic Development Corporation) by virtue of a failed business deal with the prior managers who had formerly leased the station without having ever had any legal claim of ownership to the station, it’s license and/or receivables. (I am including a copy of said “loan agreement” for you to see that it in no way includes “receivables”, “income”, “cash” or any other mention of “finances” or “intangibles” as security to the loan.) Mr. Rushing has blatantly lied about this in court on numerous occasions (with much coaching and consciously active assistance of the district attorney, Lynn Switzer) while my attorney has refused to object to the lies or to even offer to ask a single question that would’ve exposed these lies “because we really don’t want to get confrontational” (this was my attorneys reason for refusing to object even after I DEMANDED his actions on the matter).

To date, neither Richard Roach nor Lynn Switzer have ever required Mr. Rushing to produce a single document assigning any form of station accounts (receivables or otherwise) to him. However, due to Mr. Rushing’s having been allowed to and actually coached in falsely testifying that the document did assign the receivables to him when it, in fact did not, this had no effect on the outcome of the trial as my attorney also refused to engage Mr. Rushing on the subject. In short, I was tried and convicted of the theft (from my own business for which it would have been a federal offense, on my part, for me to not control) and was sent to prison for 14 months because I obeyed federal law, as mandated by the federal license that I legitimately held.

I have since had the original trial, verdict and sentencing declared to have been unconstitutional by the Texas court of Criminal Appeals in Austin. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals also ruled that I “received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and at sentencing”. However, the corruption runs so deeply in this part of Texas that neither of my two previous attorneys has been willing to push for a retrial, despite the court’s ruling that I did not receive a fair trial or even a fair appeal in the first case. Worse yet, I am now a convicted felon and while in prison I lost my license to the radio station as I was unable to attend an FCC hearing that was convened due to several fraudulent complaints that were filed by Mr. Rushing. This was intentionally done due to his knowing that it would be impossible for me to appear and to defend myself against the known fraudulent complaints that have now deprived me of my livelihood. Of course, Lynn Switzer is very openly proud of these criminally inclined accomplishments that were committed during my UNCONSTITUTIONAL INCARCERATION BY THE STATE OF TEXAS.

Due to threats of physical harm made against them while I was in prison (due to Lynn Switzer’s unconstitutional court order) by the former - now deceased - county constable, my children have been sent to live in Alabama with my parents for fear of their lives and safety. (What does it say for the “State of Texas” when Texas officials are allowed to wantonly threaten the lives of innocent children in order to achieve their criminal goals of stealing from legitimate business owners? Particularly, when the local district attorney is one of the parties actively involved in the threats? Is this something the “great” State of Texas” should be proud of? In refusing to investigate these continuing crimes and seeking true justice, it would appear to be so.)

Until recently, my wife and I resided near Shamrock in utter poverty trying to pay the probation fees to keep myself from returning for the remainder of the, as previously determined by the courts, unconstitutional prison sentence. However,, my employer told me, during March of this year, that Mr. Rushing was pressuring her to terminate my employment by telling her that she should help him “do something about Mr. Hammond.” So, I helped my wife move to a home that she has in Alabama in order to manage her own business there. Of course, the local Gestapo refuses to allow me the luxury of living with my family in another location and would prefer to keep me “pinned down” by ordering me to “work at a local business” (a minimum wage proposition at best). This also forces me to continue the neglect of clients of my – at one time – thriving consulting business. Guess how much broadcast engineering needs to be done in Wheeler County, which had but a single radio station which was mine that the local “criminal courthouse network” fought so valiantly – and illegally – to shut-down.

There are so many other parts to this story that cry out for an investigation but the stumbling block has always been and continues to be the office of the local district attorney. Any complaint that has been filed locally has always been quashed by the DA or by local law enforcement.

Mr. Rushing wanted ownership of my radio station because it was the only piece of free media in the area and he, Roach and the rest of the drug ring were unable to control me.  The original DA, Richard Roach, pushed for my conviction as an act of retaliation because he was informed by Mr. Rushing that I was planning to reveal his courthouse drug, firearms and child porn dealing and other criminal activities in an exposé style news story on my radio station. I have a recording of a meeting between myself and Mr. Rushing in which Mr. Rushing in the presence of attorney John Mann, tells me “If you don’t sign over the license of your radio station to me, I can tell the DA that you are about to broadcast certain things about him and us local officials on your station and, if you are lucky, he will only help us send you to prison but, you might not ever been seen again, either. How would you like that?” (Mr. Roach is now serving 5 years in Federal prison and 18 years in state prison for, among other things, dealing and using methamphetamines and illegal firearms from his offices at the courthouse in the 31^st Judicial District of Texas. The child pornography charges were dropped as a result of a plea-bargain agreement.)

Mr. Roach’s assistant, Lynn Switzer, who tried my case, has previously told me and others (before witnesses) that “the case against you has no real legal merit but, as I was ordered by Mr. Roach to prosecute you ‘to the max’, if I back down now, I will be subjecting my office to further investigation that it cannot withstand”. Ms. Switzer is now head DA. Lynn Switzer continues to actively, willfully and maliciously obstruct justice and to generally be an obstructionist with respect to any investigation into matters pertaining to me or to my family and business because of this continuing fear of any further investigation of her office that would clearly reveal her willful and malicious criminal involvement in these matters.

While I was in prison, an attempt was made on my life by one Dan Luna. This attempt on my life was made within two weeks of Lynn Switzer’s having sent me a message via a very public display in the local courthouse and before several area residents in which she stated that she “plans to be there for the kill when the radio station guy gets taken out”. The trail of this saga leads straight back to Shamrock, where Luna allegedly went on to murder another local individual (contracted killing) once he was released from prison, consequently within just a few days of the attempt on my life.

There is so much to digest with respect to the case that a friend had me set up a website to tell the story…but even it can be quite nebulous and difficult to unravel. Please see the evidence (mostly certified court documentation) at www.shamrockjustice.com. Interestingly enough (and despite the fact that this material consists mostly of court certified evidence), Mr. Rushing now very vehemently – and very publicly - denies most of the materials presented there even though a majority of it consists of transcripts of his own court testimony that was given while under oath!

I would be most grateful and I am asking that you would please have someone there review the information and discretely talk to me and others in the area who are, understandably, extremely afraid to speak openly about the crimes that have been and continue to be perpetrated here. With the help of just one sincere investigator who is truly interested in seeking real justice and not in vindicating his or her associates at any cost, I can flesh it out better than anyone. Over the last 6 years I have prayed many times that I would be willing to give up anything if just one honest investigator would spend just one week discretely checking out my claims that I can assure you are rooted solidly in court documented facts that, for some odd reason, no one seems to want to look at locally because it “could be embarrassing to the great state of Texas”.

With respect to my claims in these matters, there are numerous state law, federal law and civil rights violations that have been allowed to continue unchecked as a direct result of Lynn Switzer’s continuing willful and malicious obstruction of justice in refusing to properly investigate and act on the criminal matters at hand:

1.                  By and through the continued willful and malicious refusal to take appropriate action of the District Attorney for the 31^st Judicial District of Texas, there was property that belonged to me that was stolen and transported to Hazard, Kentucky. A confession of this was obtained by a former Shamrock City Police officer who is still working in this area as a Wheeler County Deputy. When local law enforcement in Kentucky responded, former DA Richard Roach had the warrant recalled with the claim that “David Rushing gave that equipment to that boy!” when David Rushing, in fact, had absolutely NO legitimate claims to my property which was not even a part of the purchase of the Shamrock radio station and had been purchased be me sometime before even moving to Texas. Both the local police officer who investigated the incident, as well as the former assistant district attorney (David Holmes, who was almost immediately replaced by Lynn Switzer) expressed surprise and astonishment at this action and both told me that this was completely unheard of as there was a “very strong case proving that this guy has stolen your equipment including a statement from his own mother that he took a van from Kentucky to Texas and brought back equipment to store on her property that was positively identified as having come from a radio station in Shamrock, Texas.” I have never recovered this equipment nor has the perpetrator been held accountable. David Rushing had no valid claims to my equipment and, as the holder of original valid sales receipts for these items, I certainly had not authorized Mr. Rushing to have my equipment removed and transported out of state in the middle of the night. The only reason I was ever given for this having happened was that, “Mr. Roach has decided to not pursue this matter as a favor to David Rushing.” As of today's date, Ms. Switzer has expressed absolutely no interest in reissuing a warrant for Jodie Ritchie in order to recover the (more than $28,000.00 in value) items that were stolen from me during this time period at the behest of David Rushing and, as a result of her willful and intentional obstruction of justice in this matter, the statute of limitations in this interstate felony theft case will have lapsed by now. This abrogation of justice and of the entire legal system has been allowed to occur and has been made possible as a direct result of Lynn Switzer’s willful and malicious refusal to properly take action in a timely manner and this can only be seen as a WILLFUL AND MALICIOUS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ON THE PART OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE 31^st JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

2.                  As recently as March, 2007, my wife has reported property being stolen from our radio station. During March of 2007, someone broke into our transmitter building and removed an STL receiver valued at approximately $3,750.00. At a June, 2007, court hearing, deputy Rick Walden testified (when asked as to the disposition of the equipment and the investigation), “We ain’t invesigatin’ any crimes against them radio station people at the request of the DA” (Lynn Switzer). This further abrogation of justice and of the entire legal system has been allowed to occur and has been made possible as a direct result of Lynn Switzer’s refusal to properly take action in a timely manner and this can only be seen as a WILLFUL AND MALICIOUS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ON THE PART OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE 31^st JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

3.                  Even more recently, there was an incident on the property where my wife and I live. Two men who were paid to steal my transmitter (an $18,000 item) and transport it out of state and into Oklahoma, which would be an attempted interstate theft of property. These men were caught on video tape after having driven a truck to the building and snatching an air conditioning unit out so they could crawl through the resulting hole in the wall (breaking and entering, at the very least). In short, they were caught in the act! They fully admitted to this on the videotape. I still have the video of this and an (approximately 4 minute) interview of the men in action on my website, www.shamrockjustice.com. This was not the first time this has happened. In fact, these kinds of events have happened here so frequently that we have stopped keeping track of them. Why bother? As our chief deputy said last June in a court hearing and on the record for all to hear, “We ain’t invesigatin’ any crimes against them radio station people at the request of the DA.” We’ve learned to simply “take it all in stride” as, the last time my wife reported a crime against our business, she soon found a concrete block that had been thrown into the windshield of her vehicle and David Rushing simply smiles about that incident to this day while telling us that we “need to learn to accept the way things are” and insisting that he knows full-well who committed the “favor to Shamrock” (as Mr. Rushing refers to these heinous events). This additional abrogation of justice and of the entire legal system has been allowed to occur and has been made possible as a direct result of Lynn Switzer’s refusal to properly take action in a timely manner and this can only be seen as a WILLFUL AND MALICIOUS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ON THE PART OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE 31^st JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

4.                  By and through the continued willful and malicious refusal to take appropriate action of the District Attorney for the 31^st Judicial District of Texas, there were approximately $49,000 in checks made payable to my business by my advertisers (some of which were personally handed to me, as the “payee”) that were forcibly stolen from me under threat of physical violence by Mr. Rushing and then illegally deposited into an account to which he had access at the local bank here in Shamrock. Mr. Rushing’s wife, Dottie, facilitated this as she worked at the bank at that time. The local bank vice president also aided in these thefts and misappropriations. I have evidence of this as well as a confession from the local bank manager. Mr. Rushing and other Shamrock employees then spent these funds on personal items such as hotel accommodations, meals, carpet for his office in downtown Shamrock etc. while bragging that they were “seeing to it that the radio station can’t pay its bills because we (they) are taking all of the money”. This was done in order to “force” Mr. Rushings’ illegal foreclosure against my radio station. This, in my opinion, is bank fraud as these are willfully misappropriated federally insured funds that Mr. Rushing unlawfully removed from my possession in order to insure that I would not be able to make payments on the loan to the previous lease holders of the radio station (which I was never a party to and was not ever, at any time, obligated to do and had offered to do as an act of kindness). This further abrogation of justice and of the entire legal system has been allowed to occur and has been made possible as a direct result of Lynn Switzer’s willful and malicious refusal to properly take action in a timely manner and this can only be seen as a WILLFUL AND MALICIOUS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ON THE PART OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE 31^st JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

5.                  Aside from the attempt on my life while unconstitutionally incarcerated in state prison, as determined by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, there have been many numerous civil rights violations with respect to mail fraud, computer crimes in accessing our computers by “hacking the passwords”, etc. (which Mr. Rushing proudly has very proudly bragged of at my trial in testimony that is recorded in the transcripts, accepted by the courts, and posted on my website), interstate telephone crimes, etc.  Official communications from the FCC to me while in prison regarding my hearings in Washington, DC were signed for by prison officials (on days in which I wasn’t even at the facility, as their own records will show) but were never delivered to me. This further abrogation of justice and of the entire legal system has also been allowed to occur and has been made possible as a direct result of Lynn Switzer’s willful and malicious refusal to properly take action in a timely manner and this can only be seen as a WILLFUL AND MALICIOUS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ON THE PART OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE 31^st JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

6.                  By and through the continued willful and malicious refusal to take appropriate action of the District Attorney for the 31^st Judicial District of Texas, my right to a fair hearing with the Federal Communications Commission was violated. I was not able to attend this hearing in 2007 due to my unconstitutional (as determined by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals) confinement. This was communicated by my disability advocate, Colonel Rodney E Jackson of Cincinnati, Ohio, both in writing and by telephone, to the Enforcement Bureau at the FCC, but the Commission had the hearing anyway and took the license and thus my livelihood from me despite my being unconstitutionally restrained from attending the hearing because of an unconstitutional court ruling that was the brainchild of Lynn Switzer. This further abrogation of justice and of the entire legal system has been allowed to occur and has been made possible as a direct result of Lynn Switzer’s willful and malicious refusal to properly take action in a timely manner and this can only be seen as a WILLFUL AND MALICIOUS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ON THE PART OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE 31^st JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

7.                  While operating my business, radio station KBKH, I was subjected to many numerous RICO and restriction of trade violations as perpetrated by Mr. Rushing, EDC director and head of Shamrock’s Chamber of Commerce. I have numerous pieces of evidence that prove the existence of a broad-based conspiracy to destroy the viability of my station in the community by Mr. David Rushing, including but not limited to emails, sworn court testimony, official memos, recorded phone conversations sent to me by advertisers who Mr. Rushing called, sometimes across state lines, with threats and innuendos. These people realized why Mr. Rushing was harassing them concerning their relationship with my business, etc. and were nice enough to forward the evidence to me for action. However, or please for justice were falling on deaf (and criminal) ears in Lynn Switzer’s office. This further abrogation of justice and of the entire legal system has been allowed to occur and has been made possible as a direct result of Lynn Switzer’s willful and malicious refusal to properly take action in a timely manner and this can only be seen as a WILLFUL AND MALICIOUS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ON THE PART OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE 31^st JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

8.                  By and through the continued willful and malicious refusal to take appropriate action of the District Attorney for the 31^st Judicial District of Texas,. Rushing has very openly and very proudly testified in court and on the record that he and “a friend who is very good with computers” were able to gain access to the computers in my radio station where they “went through the files and could do whatever we wanted” on several occasions. Mr. Rushing then, very brazenly, proved that he had perpetrated these computer crimes by providing court testimony in which he was able to name almost every person to whom we owed payment, as well as amounts that were due – facts that were only available to someone who had obtained unauthorized criminal access to our computers. This is a clear and open confession to multiple counts of federal computer crimes and should be investigated as such. This further abrogation of justice and of the entire legal system has been allowed to occur and has been made possible as a direct result of Lynn Switzer’s willful and malicious refusal to properly take action in a timely manner and this can only be seen as a WILLFUL AND MALICIOUS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ON THE PART OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE 31^st JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

9.                  By and through the continued willful and malicious refusal to take appropriate action of the District Attorney for the 31^st Judicial District of Texas, Mr. Rushing was also able to fully utilized the resources of his public offices to see his plan to destroy my business through to fruition by the use of the following:

•  taxpayer paid legal assistance,

•  his taxpayer paid staff,

•  his city owned office computer,

• telephones,

• fax,

• mail, etc.

Mr. Rushing used these all, on state and city paid time to persecute me, my family and anyone who advertised with us or who tried to help us in any way during the time that our business was operational. This persecution is easily provable and continues to happen even to this day as an ongoing and continuing course of criminal conduct that is made possible by the willful and intentional malicious obstructions of justice that are being perpetrated by Lynn Switzer. One gentleman whom Mr. Rushing called in North Dakota – thereby crossing state lines and making this a federal offense - even recorded Mr. Rushing’s threats and mailed a copy to me but, in keeping with the already established pattern, the local DA absolutely refused to investigate. Other businesses in Shamrock have received similar treatment and their stories can be conveyed to a patient investigator as well. This further abrogation of justice and of the entire legal system has been allowed to occur and has been made possible as a direct result of Lynn Switzer’s willful and malicious refusal to properly take action in a timely manner and this can only be seen as a WILLFUL AND MALICIOUS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ON THE PART OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE 31^st JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS.

I can further demonstrate the extent to which both Mr. Rushing and Ms. Switzer have conspired against me right here and right now if you are only willing to grant me a few additional moments of your time.

I can also demonstrate that these acts continue to this day as a continuing course of criminal conduct. Mr. Rushing, aided and abetted by Ms. Switzer, again repeated his perjured testimony at a hearing in Wheeler as recently as June of 2007 and continues to repeat these lies and perjured testimony - both under oath and not - at every opportunity provided him by anyone. My wife is also accused of these same “made up” crimes with the only possible hope of a successful prosecution being Ms. Switzer’s bringing out David Rushing to parrot his well coached and well rehearsed (as well as very perjured) testimony yet again.

Here are some facts substantiating my statements:

Fact #1

Please see the copy of the court transcripts that I have included with this letter. Note that the document is an exact copy of a court transcript as certified to be "True and Correct" by Toni A. McClendon CSR, P.O. Box 766, Wheeler, Texas 79096, (806) 826-5501, (806) 665-4178.

On page 14 of the document (lines 14 through 21), read David Rushing's testimony stating specifically that "Well, as far as the business, we were the lienholder [sic] on the property and the accounts payable and accounts receivable and so forth and as -- as far as a business goes like that, yes." Note that David Rushing has, in making this statement, just told a jury, as a statement of fact, that he absolutely did hold a lien against the accounts of the radio station that was owned by myself, Terry Keith Hammond.

Please see the copy of the “Loan Agreement” and “Security Agreement” that I have included with this letter. Note that the document is an exact copy of both a "Promissory Note" and an attached "Security Agreement" as signed by David Rushing and the former officers of Shamrock Broadcasting of Texas, Inc. Also, note that the document is Marked as "States Exhibit 4" and, as such is also court certified as being a "True and Correct" copy. (Please also temporarily ignore the fact that Shamrock Broadcasting of Texas, Inc. never even owned the radio station against which they were borrowing and, as a result, had entered into an UNLAWFUL AGREEMENT with Mr. Rushing.)

Read the entire document very carefully and look for any references to "accounts payable" and/or "accounts receivable" or, more simply "payables" and/or "receivables" or even “intangibles”. You will find NO MENTION of these items contained within the document, which directly and clearly impeaches Mr. Rushing’s testimony (above).

On page 2 (the "Security Agreement"), please read the final paragraph above the signatures. Note that it very specifically indicates that the "collateral" (security) of the loan shall consist of "ALL INVENTORY, FIXTURES, FURNITURE, EQUIPMENT NOW OWNED OR HEREAFTER ACQUIRED WHEREVER LOCATED".

Now, as shown in the court transcripts quoted above, Mr. Rushing has already provided sworn testimony stating as fact that the loan was secured by the radio station's receivables (the grounds for the entire criminally contrived case against me, which is a blatant LIE). In order to justify any prosecution, we must then determine which of the items listed as "collateral" (security against the loan) would be applicable to the radio station's receivables. (Lynn Switzer, the prosecutor of this case, was obviously able to do this in her own mind and has certainly concluded that one or more of these items is applicable to the radio station's accounts. Otherwise, she certainly would not have been able to ethically continue with my prosecution in this case.)

Based on these facts, we must be able to conclusively determine that my “receivables” can be readily defined as one of more of the following items that are the only items listed as “security” on the loan agreement:

1.    Would it be possible to label the radio station's income (my receivables) as "INVENTORY"? This is not likely as a radio station's "INVENTORY" is universally recognized as being the airtime that is available for sale to advertisers.

2.    Would it be possible to label the radio station's income (my receivables) as "FIXTURES"? This, also, is not likely as not very much of the radio station's operation depends upon "FIXTURES" that are made of paper (as in "cash") or coins.

3.    Would it be possible to label the radio station's income (my receivables) as "FURNITURE"? This, too, is not likely as not many businesses are willing to allow visitors to sit on, eat on, sleep on or to otherwise recline on, lounge on, relax on and/or use money as "FURNITURE".

4.    Would it then be possible to label the radio station's income (my receivables) as "EQUIPMENT"? This, too, is not likely as most piles of cash are not useable as any form of "EQUIPMENT" and, even if such a silly argument were to be attempted, as virtually every piece of "EQUIPMENT" that is utilized in the day to day operations of a radio station is electrical in nature, where would one insert the power cord to “power up” a stack of cash?

Based upon this information, the ONLY available logical conclusion after having studied the details above is that David Rushing willfully and maliciously LIED to the courts and to the jury while under oath at my trial when he falsely represented to the jury (as a statement of fact) that "we were the lienholder [sic] on the property and the accounts payable and accounts receivable".

The above statement, as sworn to and testified to by David Rushing (while under oath in open court), is fraudulent and constitutes WILLFUL AND MALICIOUS PERJURY.

As a result of these underlying facts, we can state most conclusively that DAVID RUSHING HAS, WITH THE WILLFUL AND MALICIOUS AID, COACHING COLLUSION AND INSTRUCTION  OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY  LYNN SWITZER,  LIED TO BOTH THE COURT AND JURY WHILE UNDER OATH  IN OPEN COURT AND IS GUILTY OF WILLFUL AND MALICIOUS PERJURY AND SHOULD BE PROSECUTED  AS SUCH.

However, as I am told, these criminal acts can only be prosecuted when a district attorney who observes these courtroom confessions to such crimes is either competent enough to WANT TO SEE IT or IS NOT ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN THE COMMISSION OF SUCH CRIMES and, as a result of such involvement, is willing to "look the other way" so as to willfully and maliciously aid in the commission of both the resulting perjury as well as the continued commission of other crimes associated with the perjured testimony.

Fact #2

Please see again the copy of the court transcripts that I have included with this letter. Note again that the document is an exact copy of a court transcript as certified to be "True and Correct" by Toni A. McClendon CSR, P.O. Box 766, Wheeler, Texas 79096, (806) 826-5501, (806) 665-4178.

On pages 5 and 6 of the document (lines 7 through 9 on page 5), read David Rushing's testimony stating specifically that "Well, the Economic Development would be in charge of signing all of the checks and Connie Wilson my secretary were the two signatures..." Note that David Rushing has, in making this statement, just told a jury, as a statement of fact, that he absolutely did hold absolute and total control of the accounts of the radio station that was owned by Terry Keith Hammond to which we've already demonstrated (in Fact 1, above) to which Mr. Rushing - despite having perjured himself to a court and jury, while under oath - had absolutely no legal grounds for asserting such control.

On pages 5 and 6 of the document (lines 11 through 25 on page 5 and line 1 on page 6), read David Rushing's testimony stating specifically that he denied ever having conferred with me and (more specifically) that I, the legal and rightful owner and licensee of the radio station,  had not ever given authorization for Mr. Rushing to assume control over the receivables of the radio station. Also, please recall that, as is demonstrated in Fact 1 (above), the radio station's receivables were NOT at any time a legal possession of either Mr. David Rushing or Ms. Connie Wilson.

Based upon this information, the ONLY available logical conclusion after having studied the details above is that,  as a result of these underlying facts, we can most conclusively state that Mr. DAVID RUSHING AND MS. CONNIE WILSON HAVE, WITH THE WILLFUL AID, COACHING COLLUSION AND INSTRUCTION  OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY  LYNN SWITZER COMMITTED NUMEROUS ACTS OF THEFT AND (because of the thefts to which he has confessed in the above court transcripts) SHOULD BE PROSECUTED FOR THESE CRIMES.

However, as I am told, these criminal acts can only be prosecuted when a district attorney who observes these courtroom confessions to such crimes is either competent enough to WANT TO SEE IT or IS NOT ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN THE COMMISSION OF SUCH CRIMES and, as a result of such involvement, is willing to "look the other way" so as to willfully and maliciously aid in the commission of both the resulting perjury as well as the continued commission of other crimes associated with the perjured testimony.

Fact #3

This is just a passing mention of a document that makes the entire "case" discussed here a completely moot point in every location that is NOT influenced by either David Rushing or Lynn Switzer.

Please see and read the only other remaining document that I have included (Affidavit of Federal Communications Commission Attorney Jerrold Miller) that specifically indicates that, not only did David Rushing NOT EVER (at any time) have the legal ability to either "employ" me (as he also fraudulently claims in these court transcripts) or to claim any form of "control" over my receivables, the people with whom Mr. Rushing had originally entered into the "loan agreement" also were NOT EVER legally in a position to enable them to pledge either the radio station or the radio station's receivables as "collateral" (security) against ANY loan at ANY time.

Based upon this further information, the ONLY available logical conclusion after having studied the details above is that, as a result of these underlying facts, we can most conclusively state that DAVID RUSHING, WITH THE WILLFUL AID, COACHING COLLUSION AND INSTRUCTION  OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY  LYNN SWITZER IS GUILTY OF BOTH PERJURY AND NUMEROUS COUNTS OF FELONY THEFT AND (because of the thefts and additional crimes to which he has confessed in the above court transcripts) SHOULD BE PROSECUTED FOR THESE CRIMES.

However, as I am told, these criminal acts can only be prosecuted when a district attorney who observes these courtroom confessions to such crimes is either competent enough to WANT TO SEE IT or IS NOT ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN THE COMMISSION OF SUCH CRIMES and, as a result of such involvement, is willing to "look the other way" so as to willfully and maliciously aid in the commission of both the resulting perjury as well as the continued commission of other crimes associated with the perjured testimony.

To date I have had absolutely no satisfaction in these matters from any form of law enforcement and so that is why I am seeking assistance from you. Will you please, without announcing his (or her) presence in advance, send an investigator from your office to Shamrock to look into these matters? The people here, most specifically Mr. David Rushing, are quite proud of their “accomplishments” in regards to getting my business and the businesses of others shut down so that they can “keep the control of this town where it belongs”. If someone will but go there and listen, they will talk about it and even brag for hours to someone that they perceive to be “one of us (them)”.

I appreciate your time and attention. Any help that you can provide is very welcomed. I sincerely pray that your office does not become “just another step in covering for the crimes of Richard Roach, Lynn Switzer and David Rushing” and that someone will actually take an interest in seeing justice served even though it might be just a bit “embarrassing” to Texas. However, following my former pleas for assistance, I should surely be most amazed, were this to happen as I have now lost ALL faith in the Justice System as it relates to Texas.

Sincerely,

Terry K. Hammond

Back to Top